Archive for March, 2010

h1

REPRESENTATIONS OVERTIME–COMPARE THE PAIR

March 20, 2010

Overtime, representations have changed due to technology, for example Alice in Wonderland. It has been remade many times and has changed as technology has become more advanced. The film that is easily comparable by technology is the famous love tragedy play, ‘Romeo and Juliet’.  Hollywood had recreated the masterpiece on screen twice (up to date) being: Franco Zeffirelli’s 1968 ‘Romeo and Juliet’ and Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 ‘William Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet’.

Zeffirelli’s film is highly traditional and periodic compared to Luhurmann’s where he captures the essence of Shakespeare for the present day viewer. The 1996 version has wild yet graceful camera angles to keep the younger audience attracted while the 1968 version is quite limited.

The films are also different with:
props: 1968 uses swords while 1996 uses guns
prologue: 1968 uses lengthy and dull conversations while 1996 uses a news broadcast over the television
setting: 1968 is set in ancient Italy while 1996 is set in Verona Beach present day.
balcony scene: 1968 is more traditional, extravagant and revolutionary while 1996 is intense and is skilfully interchanged with a pool

Luhurmann’s “Romeo and Juliet’ transforms Shakespeare’s writings into a contemporary location with modern concepts yet keeps the Shakespearean language alive. Both films are highly entertaining but its best to know a bit about the play before watching it (but who doesn’t know about the story of R+J anyway?)

Baz Luhurmann once quoted about the film:
“The idea behind the ‘created world’ was that it was made up of 20th century icons, and these images are there to clarify what’s being said, because once the viewer understands it, the power and beauty of the language (work) is magic.”

h1

OSCAR LOVES A GOOD VILLAIN

March 9, 2010

How evil can you get and still win an Oscar? With yesterday’s prestigious Academy Awards taken place, at least three very different but villainous characters were nominated. Let’s see now: a completely insane Nazi. Check. A sick serial killer. Check. A really really really bad mum. Check. Out of the three characters, two won.

Austrian actor Christoph Waltz won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor who played a creepy yet charming Nazi who loved to torment Jews in Inglourious Basterds while Mo’Nique won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress for her role as the bad mother in Precious. Stanley Tucci was nominated for Best Supporting Actor for his role as a serial killer in The Lovely Bones.

Villains often rule at the Oscars and here are the other talented actors and actresses that have won an Academy Award for their bad-ass role:
BEST ACTRESS:

  • Charlize Theron: Prostitute serial killer, Aileen Wuornos in Monster
  • Kate Winslet: Last year’s winner for her role as Hanna Schmitx, a former Nazi concentration camp guard in The Reader

BEST ACTOR:

  • Anthony Hopkins:  Creepy  killer Hannibal Lecter in The Silence of the Lambs

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR:

  • Javie Bardem: Anton Chigurh in No Country For Old Men
  • Heath Ledger: Psychopath clown ‘The Joker’ in The Dark Knight

Personally, I believe that only some actors and actresses that portray a villain deserve an oscar because they make the character so in depth and charismatic, who are so bad that you are completely charmed by them.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.